<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Obsolete Your Idols &#187; templars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.manjusri.org/tag/templars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.manjusri.org</link>
	<description>Book Reviews and Blather</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 18:46:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Foucault&#8217;s Pendulum</title>
		<link>http://blog.manjusri.org/2008/01/09/swing-batter-batter/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.manjusri.org/2008/01/09/swing-batter-batter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>binder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternate history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occult]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[templars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.manjusri.org/2008/01/09/swing-batter-batter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This isn't the first time I've tried to read Umberto Eco, but it's the first time I finished.  Perhaps, like Catch-22, I needed to age into it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finished reading my first book by Eco yestereve,  <a href="http://www.powells.com/partner/32095/biblio/9780345368751">Foucault&#8217;s Pendulum</a>.  This is another one of those books where my co-workers, seeing me read it, had opinions about it.  My boss loves it and the CEO has re-read it several times.  Contrariwise, another co-worker hated it.  This isn&#8217;t the first time I&#8217;ve tried to read Umberto Eco, but it&#8217;s the first time I finished.  Perhaps, like <a href="http://www.powells.com/partner/32095/biblio/9780684833392">Catch-22</a>, I needed to age into it.  It&#8217;s got a lot of things I enjoyed in <a href="http://www.powells.com/partner/32095/biblio/9780440539810">The Illuminatus! Trilogy</a> and I can see where it would lend itself to increased enjoyment with re-reading.</p>
<p>One frustration I had with it is that parts of it are in languages I don&#8217;t read and, in fact, it was originally written in a language I don&#8217;t read, giving me the impression that there&#8217;s much more going on there in the text than I can understand.  If I re-read it, I&#8217;ll have to do it with  different dictionaries, one for Italian, one for French, one for Latin.  Ideally I&#8217;d learn Italian and read it in the original but I don&#8217;t know if there are enough years left for that.</p>
<p>The story itself is structured as a pair of nested flashbacks and there are other flashbacks embedded inside of it.  The core conceit of the work (the Plan) is that it&#8217;s constructed through a randomization of text fragments, strikingly like the reputed method PKD used when writing <a href="http://www.powells.com/partner/32095/biblio/9780425043233">The Man in the High Castle</a>, so there&#8217;s another literary parallel which I found enjoyable.   Ultimately, though, I wasn&#8217;t as happy with the shaggy dog story flow where it all boils down to &#8220;bad things are going to happen because people are gullible&#8221;.</p>
<p>What I liked</p>
<ul>
<li>whirlwind tours of occult history</li>
<li>characterizations of minor characters, thin and sharp as a thumb&#8217;s nail</li>
<li>presentation of alternative explanations for history&#8217;s events</li>
<li>references and call-outs to other works I&#8217;ve read</li>
</ul>
<p>What I didn&#8217;t</p>
<ul>
<li>sometimes hard to follow conversations in languages I don&#8217;t read</li>
<li>not a real sense of closure at the end of the story</li>
</ul>
<p>Who might enjoy this book</p>
<ul>
<li>occultists, diabolicals, fans of conspiracy for the sake of conspiring</li>
<li>members of spiritual knighthoods</li>
<li>late modernist readers who like texts they can deconstruct and still have something left to hold</li>
<li>polymaths and multilinguists</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.manjusri.org/2008/01/09/swing-batter-batter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

