Posts Tagged ‘sf’

Space Cops

Saturday, June 12th, 2010

Shannon Prickett,
June 12, 2010
Rating: 2 out of 3

Sketch a Venn diagram. One circle is HARD SF by which I mean scientifically plausible (or almost) fiction. A second circle is SPACE OPERA by which I mean dramatic or melodramatic adventures in the vast spaces between worlds. The third and last circle is POLICE PROCEDURAL by which I mean a story focusing on the actions of law enforcement meant to capture the (sometimes tedious) details of their work. At the space where those three circles overlap is Alastair Reynolds’s book The Prefect.

If you are not into all of those, this book is going to misfire for you, in all likelihood. Fortunately for me, this is my sweet spot. The SF isn’t all that hard compared to some of his other books, but it was sufficiently robust; the opera isn’t all that melodramatic but it did have a larger than life threat, moments of emotional irony and loud bombastic characters; the procedural is mostly field work and demonstrating adaptability. These all seemed to me to be compromises meant to not push the novel too far out of the overlap in any one direction. Best of all, it works.

In a future where a distributed society (humans, uplifted warpigs, post digital sentience) takes voting Very Seriously Indeed, the police agency we follow about in this narrative are the election prefects. They investigate voting irregularities, enforce the will of the people if needed, and defend the polity from disruptions, both internal and external. It’s structured in the way I expect an Alastair Reynolds book to be, with a progressively exposed and escalating threat, likable but flawed protagonists, gradual exposure of underpinnings like an onion being peeled.

Now, I’m reading this in the context of someone who’s read other Alastair Reynolds books but it seems to me that if you have never read his stuff, this book is probably an accessible if meaty jumping on point. This book would lead fans of N!C!I!S! or CSI:MiamYEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAH or Law & Order: Criminally Ingenious into Reynolds’s SF universe following the thread of the Great Detective protagonist. Tom Dreyfus, in this book, is Goren, he’s Gibbs, he’s Horatio, he’s Sherlock, he’s the messed up, twisted up inside, too sharp for his own good, driven by circumstance, caught in the spider’s web, hero.

Back by popular request, my book review lists:

    People who might like this book

  • Fans of Police Procedural TV shows
  • SF readers looking for a meaty satisfying entry to an intricate universe
  • People who can’t WAIT to be digitized and give up their bodies to gain awesome super powers
  • People who love democracy. Really really love democracy.
    People who might not like this book

  • People looking for something shorter, like the OED
  • People who are looking for a book exploring the complex inner life of a troubled girl who never goes anywhere or does anything
  • People who are interested in the tactical games played in societies with strict social mores in order to gain or avoid an arranged marriage to a Person of Influence

Feels Like Yesterday

Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

Shannon Prickett,
March 17, 2010

Rating: 3 out of 3

I’ve read the Roger Zelazny novel Lord of Light numerous times. First, as a pre-teen doggedly going to the end of the science fiction section of my public library and reading the books there, beginning with the alphabetically last author and rewinding to the beginning of the alphabet. In my memory, I read them all at least once, then I started going back to re-read my favorites. Lord of Light would have been one of the first, its poetry stuck in my head.

Over the years since then, I’ve read it again. Sometimes after an abyssmal book, to cleanse the palette. Sometimes when I was facing a big decision in my life and wanted an absorbing distraction. Most recently, I read it because it was the Book of Honor at Potlatch 2010. The panel dedicated to discussing the book introduced one of the reasons it was selected: cultural appropriation. That’s one of those hot phrases in recent discussions about writing. If cultural appropriation exists [and JT Stewart made a good case that it or something rather like it does], this novel is an example of it on two levels.

First, Zelazny was neither a Hindu nor a Buddhist, but the setting is constructed from pieces of the Hindu culture and beliefs and the protagonist deploys a scheme with Buddhist trappings.

Second, within the context of the novel, the reason for the Hindu and Buddhist bits are that the characters have deliberately chosen to mine out the useful levers from those cultures and use them to shape the world.  In the clearest terms, they have appropriated those cultures and deployed the likenesses which will motivate people and control their environments.

That was the first surprise for me in the panel discussion, an angle I hadn’t considered of the story, and one which came in with two tines. The second surprise in the panel discussion was learning that most of the panelists did not like the story. Imagine that, an award winning novel, widely read, and most of the people who showed up to talk about it didn’t care for it. Some conceded that they had liked it when first reading it but upon further reflection or re-reading, they liked it less, and sometimes not at all. One panelist didn’t like it when she first read it, until she read more analysis of it and then the book was improved by those alternate interpretations and readings of it.

Which is a long way of saying that hardly anyone there who got to speak agreed with me, about Lord of Light being a worthy and re-readable book, an interesting book, a lyrical book, in short, a good book. So this positive review score I’m giving it is one I give in the face of bold disagreement by others. Which I’m okay with.

The story of the book is told largely through a very long flashback. The protagonist is summoned, literally reincarnated, his atman or soul stuff into a body. When he’s more at home in the body, he remembers his past before he was discorporated and that is the meat of the book.  Eventually we find out how he was unable to keep body and soul together and then there’s a wrap up where he wins the war he’s been fighting for about a century. The value of this story is not in being ignorant of the storyline, but in the prose it’s presented in, the implications of the actions and, as with all Zelazny stories, the things he doesn’t tell us.

I think that last element is what keeps me coming back to Zelazny’s writings; he doesn’t tell the reader everything, he takes the story halfway and then the reader has to step forward to meet it there. If you are a reader who needs everything explained, you will not like Zelazny. But that kind of challenge slash puzzle slash opportunity is exactly the kind of narrative my mind seizes upon and savors. So it is with this work.  We’re given bursts of lush prose and vast empty spaces of implication and incompleteness.

Not to say it’s a flawless work.  There are points which bothered me the first time and still do.  An example would be how  extracting the stored pattern of Sam’s consciousness from the media in which it was stored removes it from that media. Or how that pattern can claim to have experienced consciousness while in the media. But those can be glossed over and forgiven.

Ordinarily I try to wrap up my reviews with lists of people who might and might not like a given work. This review is different, I’m experimenting with hReview markup in response to an article on why book reviews are hard to search for. If you miss those lists, comment and I’ll revise.

Orcs in Alpha Complex

Monday, October 19th, 2009

I read another Charles Stross novel, Halting State. Overall, I think I enjoyed Glasshouse slightly more, but this one was more amusing more often. It starts with a bank inside an MMORPG getting robbed and ends with a 419 nod, so it’s an internet-savvy narrative. It’s got some characters who are likable, though their flaws don’t seem to really hinder them. The shy nerd with a sexcrime history gets laid, the cop with the uppity kid never has to take time off from the case to settle his hash, the accountant with the brittle work situation never suffers from office politics during the course of the story. It’s pretty light on the characters but correspondingly there’s some meaty cryptographic and augmented reality dealt to the reader in careful doses.

The more I think about it, the less satisfied I am with the way things resolve, so I’m optimistic about a rumored sequel which I hope will explain more about why Scotland’s software infrastructure survives the threat which emerges in this novel, but that’s just quibbling. This is a pretty good near future sf novel with varied characters and a briskly moving storyline.

Who might like it

  • Gamers, both the tabletop and mmorpg flavors, and possibly casino to a lesser degree.
  • Fans of nerd protagonists.
  • People who just can’t get enough of the intricate crinkling of police procedurals.

Who might not like it

  • People who think you’re getting a whole novel about people playing an MMORPG.
  • People who felt Orcbusters in The Computer Always Shoots Twice was fundamentally cheating.

Making Omelettes

Friday, August 21st, 2009

I don’t really know who Emily Devenport is.  Because of the way I came by one of her books, I suspect she’s a member of Broad Universe.  At a Wiscon a few years ago, I wandered past the Broad Universe table and one of the book covers caught my eye.  It’s got a dark skinned woman in what looks a bit like Star Wars Stormtrooper armor kneedeep in a pitted dessert landscape while behind her a looming egg shape contains (reflects?) a bright and complicated landscape, possibly a distorted version of the one she stands in.  It’s called EggHeads.

It’s the story of a lucky woman who takes chances to improve her lot and ends up potentially altering the course of human history.  I gather it’s the start of a series and not the only work by Emily Devenport so if it turns out to be the kind of thing you like, there’s more of it available.  I’ll be seeking out more of her stuff, myself.

What I liked

  • The structure of the story.  It’s in three major sections, each titled and each well-divided from the others
  • The protagonist.  She’s fierce and lucky, two of my favorite qualities.
  • The reveals in this story, where things we are told make no sense until later in the story

What I didn’t like

  • The protagonist forgiving her asshole boyfriend.  Repeatedly.
  • The ending was a little too pat for my tastes but perhaps later works in this setting undo the happily ever after.

Overall it’s a strong far future science fiction story once you get past the crutch of near-light travel.  It’s got a likable protagonist facing tough odds and beating at least some of those odds.

Who might like this book

  • People who like sf by women about women

Who might not like this book

  • People who don’t like sf by women
  • Or about women

Stability and Fragility

Sunday, August 2nd, 2009

I’ve been reading a lot of airport language books lately, because my employer is undergoing some changes.  New people, new focus, new strategy, and I wanted to keep up with the thinking and jargon going into this transformation.  But when I haven’t been reading those, I’ve been reading short stuff to cleanse my palate.  Here’s something I read worth talking about, the collection by Eileen Gunn named Stable Strategies and Others.

I think this is it, all the collected Gunn, and I say that with keen disappointment because these stories range from the great to the mindblowingly awesome.

I’m not going to go line by line on these but I do want to especially call out “Fellow Americans” which is an alternate history where Nixon hosts a gameshow, “Nirvana High” which is set in and around Kurt Cobain High School and “Green Fire”, a round-robin story about Heinlein and Asimov and Hopper.  These stories were the highlights for me but here’s the thing:  if you read this collection I doubt you’d agree with me on which stories are the best but I bet you will really love some of the stories in it.

Who might like this collection

  • people with short attention spans, who generally like weird fiction
  • people who’ve lived in Seattle
  • people who remember the politics of the 60s and 70s

Who might not like this collection

  • people who don’t like the sf/f genres
  • people who don’t like in-jokes in their fiction

An Uplifting Tale of Sorts

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008

People had been telling me about but not exactly recommending M. John Harrison’s novel Light to me for a couple of years.  Having now read it, I think I can see why.  The story of this novel is very convenient, a sort of happy ending where everything fits a nice orderly pattern, but the construction of it aspires to concealing that pattern for as long as possible.  The setting is the near-past and the far future, and the central three human characters are depicted through a common lens of them making non-rational decisions which they then don’t attempt to rationalize to themselves or anyone else.  It revolves around a very large maguffin, indeed.  A strange place in space where every technology you try, works.

I found it a frustrating book.  Other people told me it was frustrating to read but they were talking about the prose style which is somewhat experimental. The language and constructs were much more accessible than those of some writers I’ve enjoyed (Robert Anton Wilson, William S. Burroughs, Samuel Delaney, Michael Moorcock, Jack Kerouac, James Joyce) and not really an impedance.   The thing which frustrated me about this story is how obliquely the author tries to tell it.  It’s a story I could express to you in thirty words.

The one thing I would like to champion about this book is the future setting.  I do like the idea of a place and time where radical physical form changes are trivial, computation is no longer a scarce commodity for anyone, intersystem travel is rapid and virtual reality addiction commonplace.  All of that is a fun setting to read about for me.

But to have half of the characters consolidated, the grand design revealed to be a trick all along, and the implausible actions of the characters not given some kind of an explanation, left me looking for the rest of this story.  There are fun bits and funny bits and there are sad bits and moving bits in this book.  But on the whole I can’t say I liked it.

Who might like this book

  • fans of space opera
  • fans of experimental writing, more poem in places than prose
  • fans of Brin’s Uplift stories who want something in that vein

Who might not like this book

  • people who hate omnipotent alien tampering ala Q of Star Trek: The Next Generation
  • people who hate unreliable narrators who won’t even justify their actions to themselves

A Three Hour Tour

Saturday, August 23rd, 2008

One of my co-workers handed me a pair of books by Jack McDevitt after having asked me a couple times if I’d read his stuff.  I hadn’t and now I have, at least one of them, Polaris.  So what is Polaris?  It’s a locked space ship mystery.

More to the point, it’s a story about a group of people who disappear out in space but leave behind a functional ship.  Years later some personal items taken from that ship are going to be auctioned off and come into the possession of Alex Benedict, an antiquities dealer, and Chase Kolpath, his lovely assistant.  I gather there’s an earlier book by McDevitt with these two characters but I didn’t feel lost or very confused without having read it.  (There was a moment when a character, Jacob, is speaking and I didn’t realize yet that that’s the name of their house AI; just a tip if you find yourself similarly confused).

The two have a relationship a touch reminiscent of Nero Wolfe and Archie Goodwin if Nero Wolfe were reticent and Archie Goodwin was a spicy spaceship pilot.  This story is like one of the Boy’s SF Adventure stories I read as a kid (YA Heinlein, say) if the active protagonist were female and the nominal male lead were distant and obsessive.  There’s plenty of science flavoring to this tale, with interesting futuristic technology and resourceful juryrigging by Chase.  There is a fair amount of macking on and by Chase but it didn’t divert from the narrative or diminish her capabilities.  Chase Kolpath is badass.  Alex Benedict is truly a fortunate employer.

In the end, I only had one qualm with the answer to the mystery and that is because I felt feinted without cause by one of the scenes along about chapter eighteen.  It seemed to me to undermine one of the needed pieces of the ending.  Even after a re-reading of that scene I still felt tricked, but I can forgive that because the whole rest of it hangs together so well.  You get to figure the mystery out along with the characters and it’s a joy to watch them do so.  This is one of the most solidly put together stories I’ve read in a long time.  Highly enjoyable, strong female protagonist, some nice scenes possible only in science fiction.

Who might like this book

  • People who are looking for sf with more than bimbo females, flat-personality rugged-jawed mouthpieces-for-ideas males and hand wavey plot resolutions
  • People who like tightly woven mystery plots
  • People who are or are likely to become trapped in a decaying orbit with quasars

Who might not like this book

  • People who like lurid future sex scenes
  • People who think girls are dumb
  • People who are sensitive about the money they spend on antiques

Armor

Sunday, January 27th, 2008

Approximately fifteen years ago, several friends of mine told me I absolutely needed to read a book by John Steakley named Vampire$.  Then they told me I needed to read Armor, by the same author.

Maybe you’ve noticed, I’m kind of slow.  I’m a slow adopter of technology,  philosophies, mindsets and habits.  So I just now read Armor.  I’m not exactly sorry I waited, but I probably would have been just as happy to have read it 15 years ago.  Sorry, Aaron.  Sorry, Jim.  Sorry, Uriah.  You guys were right, I should have leapt at the chance.

Be that as it may, maybe you haven’t read Steakley, yet, either.  I’m here to tell you that you probably should, if you are looking for a certain kind of experience.  Do you like James Bond movies?  Die Hard movies?  Did you like Forever War at least as much if not more than Glory Road?  Then this book is for you.   It is one man’s story, launched into without any past, any sense of what drives him, in the brutal face of endless war.  It’s got bureaucratic SNAFUs, it’s got dark humor, it’s got graphic fight scenes.  Then in the second part, we get to see the rest of the world from another point of view, more fun, less brutal.  Then it all knots back together at the end.

It’s probably technically space opera, it’s combat fetishizing, and it moves at a high speed pace.

Who might like this book

  • Fans of:
    • Harrison’s Bill the Galactic Hero
    • Resnick’s Santiago
    • The first Zelazny Amber book
    • The aforementioned movies and books I compared it to
  • People looking for something fast to stuff in their pocket and take on a short plane flight
  • Players of FPS games

Who might not like this book

  • People who can’t read past typographical errors, the copy editor seemed to be asleep on this printing
  • People who want a richly detailed background  and snort at testosterone blurred scenes
  • Pacifists, romantics, deconstructionists, and faith-based intellects

I still haven’t read Vampire$, by the way.  But it’s on my shelves, now.

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!

Visit our friends!

A few highly recommended friends...