Foucault’s Pendulum
Wednesday, January 9th, 2008I finished reading my first book by Eco yestereve, Foucault’s Pendulum. This is another one of those books where my co-workers, seeing me read it, had opinions about it. My boss loves it and the CEO has re-read it several times. Contrariwise, another co-worker hated it. This isn’t the first time I’ve tried to read Umberto Eco, but it’s the first time I finished. Perhaps, like Catch-22, I needed to age into it. It’s got a lot of things I enjoyed in The Illuminatus! Trilogy and I can see where it would lend itself to increased enjoyment with re-reading.
One frustration I had with it is that parts of it are in languages I don’t read and, in fact, it was originally written in a language I don’t read, giving me the impression that there’s much more going on there in the text than I can understand. If I re-read it, I’ll have to do it with different dictionaries, one for Italian, one for French, one for Latin. Ideally I’d learn Italian and read it in the original but I don’t know if there are enough years left for that.
The story itself is structured as a pair of nested flashbacks and there are other flashbacks embedded inside of it. The core conceit of the work (the Plan) is that it’s constructed through a randomization of text fragments, strikingly like the reputed method PKD used when writing The Man in the High Castle, so there’s another literary parallel which I found enjoyable. Ultimately, though, I wasn’t as happy with the shaggy dog story flow where it all boils down to “bad things are going to happen because people are gullible”.
What I liked
- whirlwind tours of occult history
- characterizations of minor characters, thin and sharp as a thumb’s nail
- presentation of alternative explanations for history’s events
- references and call-outs to other works I’ve read
What I didn’t
- sometimes hard to follow conversations in languages I don’t read
- not a real sense of closure at the end of the story
Who might enjoy this book
- occultists, diabolicals, fans of conspiracy for the sake of conspiring
- members of spiritual knighthoods
- late modernist readers who like texts they can deconstruct and still have something left to hold
- polymaths and multilinguists
