Archive for the ‘Review’ Category

Space Cops

Saturday, June 12th, 2010

Shannon Prickett,
June 12, 2010
Rating: 2 out of 3

Sketch a Venn diagram. One circle is HARD SF by which I mean scientifically plausible (or almost) fiction. A second circle is SPACE OPERA by which I mean dramatic or melodramatic adventures in the vast spaces between worlds. The third and last circle is POLICE PROCEDURAL by which I mean a story focusing on the actions of law enforcement meant to capture the (sometimes tedious) details of their work. At the space where those three circles overlap is Alastair Reynolds’s book The Prefect.

If you are not into all of those, this book is going to misfire for you, in all likelihood. Fortunately for me, this is my sweet spot. The SF isn’t all that hard compared to some of his other books, but it was sufficiently robust; the opera isn’t all that melodramatic but it did have a larger than life threat, moments of emotional irony and loud bombastic characters; the procedural is mostly field work and demonstrating adaptability. These all seemed to me to be compromises meant to not push the novel too far out of the overlap in any one direction. Best of all, it works.

In a future where a distributed society (humans, uplifted warpigs, post digital sentience) takes voting Very Seriously Indeed, the police agency we follow about in this narrative are the election prefects. They investigate voting irregularities, enforce the will of the people if needed, and defend the polity from disruptions, both internal and external. It’s structured in the way I expect an Alastair Reynolds book to be, with a progressively exposed and escalating threat, likable but flawed protagonists, gradual exposure of underpinnings like an onion being peeled.

Now, I’m reading this in the context of someone who’s read other Alastair Reynolds books but it seems to me that if you have never read his stuff, this book is probably an accessible if meaty jumping on point. This book would lead fans of N!C!I!S! or CSI:MiamYEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAH or Law & Order: Criminally Ingenious into Reynolds’s SF universe following the thread of the Great Detective protagonist. Tom Dreyfus, in this book, is Goren, he’s Gibbs, he’s Horatio, he’s Sherlock, he’s the messed up, twisted up inside, too sharp for his own good, driven by circumstance, caught in the spider’s web, hero.

Back by popular request, my book review lists:

    People who might like this book

  • Fans of Police Procedural TV shows
  • SF readers looking for a meaty satisfying entry to an intricate universe
  • People who can’t WAIT to be digitized and give up their bodies to gain awesome super powers
  • People who love democracy. Really really love democracy.
    People who might not like this book

  • People looking for something shorter, like the OED
  • People who are looking for a book exploring the complex inner life of a troubled girl who never goes anywhere or does anything
  • People who are interested in the tactical games played in societies with strict social mores in order to gain or avoid an arranged marriage to a Person of Influence

Feels Like Yesterday

Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

Shannon Prickett,
March 17, 2010

Rating: 3 out of 3

I’ve read the Roger Zelazny novel Lord of Light numerous times. First, as a pre-teen doggedly going to the end of the science fiction section of my public library and reading the books there, beginning with the alphabetically last author and rewinding to the beginning of the alphabet. In my memory, I read them all at least once, then I started going back to re-read my favorites. Lord of Light would have been one of the first, its poetry stuck in my head.

Over the years since then, I’ve read it again. Sometimes after an abyssmal book, to cleanse the palette. Sometimes when I was facing a big decision in my life and wanted an absorbing distraction. Most recently, I read it because it was the Book of Honor at Potlatch 2010. The panel dedicated to discussing the book introduced one of the reasons it was selected: cultural appropriation. That’s one of those hot phrases in recent discussions about writing. If cultural appropriation exists [and JT Stewart made a good case that it or something rather like it does], this novel is an example of it on two levels.

First, Zelazny was neither a Hindu nor a Buddhist, but the setting is constructed from pieces of the Hindu culture and beliefs and the protagonist deploys a scheme with Buddhist trappings.

Second, within the context of the novel, the reason for the Hindu and Buddhist bits are that the characters have deliberately chosen to mine out the useful levers from those cultures and use them to shape the world.  In the clearest terms, they have appropriated those cultures and deployed the likenesses which will motivate people and control their environments.

That was the first surprise for me in the panel discussion, an angle I hadn’t considered of the story, and one which came in with two tines. The second surprise in the panel discussion was learning that most of the panelists did not like the story. Imagine that, an award winning novel, widely read, and most of the people who showed up to talk about it didn’t care for it. Some conceded that they had liked it when first reading it but upon further reflection or re-reading, they liked it less, and sometimes not at all. One panelist didn’t like it when she first read it, until she read more analysis of it and then the book was improved by those alternate interpretations and readings of it.

Which is a long way of saying that hardly anyone there who got to speak agreed with me, about Lord of Light being a worthy and re-readable book, an interesting book, a lyrical book, in short, a good book. So this positive review score I’m giving it is one I give in the face of bold disagreement by others. Which I’m okay with.

The story of the book is told largely through a very long flashback. The protagonist is summoned, literally reincarnated, his atman or soul stuff into a body. When he’s more at home in the body, he remembers his past before he was discorporated and that is the meat of the book.  Eventually we find out how he was unable to keep body and soul together and then there’s a wrap up where he wins the war he’s been fighting for about a century. The value of this story is not in being ignorant of the storyline, but in the prose it’s presented in, the implications of the actions and, as with all Zelazny stories, the things he doesn’t tell us.

I think that last element is what keeps me coming back to Zelazny’s writings; he doesn’t tell the reader everything, he takes the story halfway and then the reader has to step forward to meet it there. If you are a reader who needs everything explained, you will not like Zelazny. But that kind of challenge slash puzzle slash opportunity is exactly the kind of narrative my mind seizes upon and savors. So it is with this work.  We’re given bursts of lush prose and vast empty spaces of implication and incompleteness.

Not to say it’s a flawless work.  There are points which bothered me the first time and still do.  An example would be how  extracting the stored pattern of Sam’s consciousness from the media in which it was stored removes it from that media. Or how that pattern can claim to have experienced consciousness while in the media. But those can be glossed over and forgiven.

Ordinarily I try to wrap up my reviews with lists of people who might and might not like a given work. This review is different, I’m experimenting with hReview markup in response to an article on why book reviews are hard to search for. If you miss those lists, comment and I’ll revise.

Orcs in Alpha Complex

Monday, October 19th, 2009

I read another Charles Stross novel, Halting State. Overall, I think I enjoyed Glasshouse slightly more, but this one was more amusing more often. It starts with a bank inside an MMORPG getting robbed and ends with a 419 nod, so it’s an internet-savvy narrative. It’s got some characters who are likable, though their flaws don’t seem to really hinder them. The shy nerd with a sexcrime history gets laid, the cop with the uppity kid never has to take time off from the case to settle his hash, the accountant with the brittle work situation never suffers from office politics during the course of the story. It’s pretty light on the characters but correspondingly there’s some meaty cryptographic and augmented reality dealt to the reader in careful doses.

The more I think about it, the less satisfied I am with the way things resolve, so I’m optimistic about a rumored sequel which I hope will explain more about why Scotland’s software infrastructure survives the threat which emerges in this novel, but that’s just quibbling. This is a pretty good near future sf novel with varied characters and a briskly moving storyline.

Who might like it

  • Gamers, both the tabletop and mmorpg flavors, and possibly casino to a lesser degree.
  • Fans of nerd protagonists.
  • People who just can’t get enough of the intricate crinkling of police procedurals.

Who might not like it

  • People who think you’re getting a whole novel about people playing an MMORPG.
  • People who felt Orcbusters in The Computer Always Shoots Twice was fundamentally cheating.

Making Omelettes

Friday, August 21st, 2009

I don’t really know who Emily Devenport is.  Because of the way I came by one of her books, I suspect she’s a member of Broad Universe.  At a Wiscon a few years ago, I wandered past the Broad Universe table and one of the book covers caught my eye.  It’s got a dark skinned woman in what looks a bit like Star Wars Stormtrooper armor kneedeep in a pitted dessert landscape while behind her a looming egg shape contains (reflects?) a bright and complicated landscape, possibly a distorted version of the one she stands in.  It’s called EggHeads.

It’s the story of a lucky woman who takes chances to improve her lot and ends up potentially altering the course of human history.  I gather it’s the start of a series and not the only work by Emily Devenport so if it turns out to be the kind of thing you like, there’s more of it available.  I’ll be seeking out more of her stuff, myself.

What I liked

  • The structure of the story.  It’s in three major sections, each titled and each well-divided from the others
  • The protagonist.  She’s fierce and lucky, two of my favorite qualities.
  • The reveals in this story, where things we are told make no sense until later in the story

What I didn’t like

  • The protagonist forgiving her asshole boyfriend.  Repeatedly.
  • The ending was a little too pat for my tastes but perhaps later works in this setting undo the happily ever after.

Overall it’s a strong far future science fiction story once you get past the crutch of near-light travel.  It’s got a likable protagonist facing tough odds and beating at least some of those odds.

Who might like this book

  • People who like sf by women about women

Who might not like this book

  • People who don’t like sf by women
  • Or about women

Stability and Fragility

Sunday, August 2nd, 2009

I’ve been reading a lot of airport language books lately, because my employer is undergoing some changes.  New people, new focus, new strategy, and I wanted to keep up with the thinking and jargon going into this transformation.  But when I haven’t been reading those, I’ve been reading short stuff to cleanse my palate.  Here’s something I read worth talking about, the collection by Eileen Gunn named Stable Strategies and Others.

I think this is it, all the collected Gunn, and I say that with keen disappointment because these stories range from the great to the mindblowingly awesome.

I’m not going to go line by line on these but I do want to especially call out “Fellow Americans” which is an alternate history where Nixon hosts a gameshow, “Nirvana High” which is set in and around Kurt Cobain High School and “Green Fire”, a round-robin story about Heinlein and Asimov and Hopper.  These stories were the highlights for me but here’s the thing:  if you read this collection I doubt you’d agree with me on which stories are the best but I bet you will really love some of the stories in it.

Who might like this collection

  • people with short attention spans, who generally like weird fiction
  • people who’ve lived in Seattle
  • people who remember the politics of the 60s and 70s

Who might not like this collection

  • people who don’t like the sf/f genres
  • people who don’t like in-jokes in their fiction

The First Rule of AV Club

Sunday, May 17th, 2009

Some of my favorite stories were all written by the same person, Philip K. Dick. So I’m always on the lookout for more stories which remind me of those stories. If you’re similar, you may want to give a read to Walter Mosley’s Blue Light. It’s a story about a group of people around the San Francisco Bay Area who experience an uncanny blue light which changes them. They then work, together and apart, to change the world they live in. Or perhaps it’s the aftermath of a cult recorded by a delusional chronicler, an interpretation which would squint towards the inaccurate if not downright unreliable narrator.

I came to read this book not because it turned up in a search of stories like those PKD wrote but because when out walking near Berkeley one day at dusk, a pedestrian saw me and asked me if I read sf. When I acknowledged his intuition, he insisted that I seek out Walter Mosley’s science fiction stories.

People who might like this book

  • Fans of PKD
  • People who live, lived or want to live in Northern California
  • Fans of the early stages of a utopia

People who might not like this book

  • Those sensitive souls who think the past was a golden age where everyone was nice
  • Those who need complete closure to a story
  • Those who think the only interesting science fiction is the most currently written

Show Me the Space

Saturday, April 4th, 2009

I guess in terms of fiction I’ve been on a space opera kick because I also read Revelation Space recently.  That’s a nicely layered book with multiple reveals that twist the earlier understanding of how things are and send the story shooting off in a new direction.

The starting impetus is that an archeologist excavating ruins of a non-human society finds something unexpected.  Then the layers of the onion start coming off, putting the archeologist’s history in new light, the find in new light, the fundamental backdrop they operate against in new light.  This book does an excellent job of making plausible each of these successive expansions of the reader’s understanding of the situation.

Things I liked about this book

  • The construction of the story
  • The structure of the setting, all the players and vectors of motive in play
  • The assassin character
  • Knowing that there are other books in this setting which I can look forward to reading, now

Things I didn’t like about this book

  • There were a few red herrings which I got invested in and which didn’t pan out
  • Some of the characters who weren’t of consequence got an odd degree of screen time, while others who were significant sometimes came out of nowhere

Who might like it

  • Space Opera fans, unite!
  • People who enjoy the kind of detective story where the author keeps expanding the scope of concern until it’s enormous
  • Fans of protagonists who are utter bastards

Who might not like it

  • Those who need every last thing explained in a story
  • Those who prefer character driven over concept driven narratives
  • People who feel like they’ve had a glut of space opera in their diet lately

Your Move

Saturday, April 4th, 2009

Continuing my long and successful plan of being the last person to read things, I recently read another Culture novel by Iain Banks, The Player of Games.  This might be my favorite book of his I’ve read and it’s largely because I could understand the central character’s motive, being a game player myself, though on a much smaller scale.

In brief, a champion game player is recruited by a faction within his society to go play a very difficult game with very high stakes and with lots of shenanigans to keep it from getting dull.  The narrative does a good job of raising the stakes and having a rewarding payoff.  Pacing is brisk, the characters are convincingly detailed, and it’s a solid, though somewhat predictable, story.

Things I liked about it

  • Central focus on games and the kind of thinking which goes into playing them
  • Larger than life sweep of events, with a rich futuristic flavor to the setting
  • Devious gambits and duplicity revealed

Things I didn’t like about it

  • The final reveal felt too pat to me
  • Some of the most dramatic events happened outside the scope of narrative

Who might like this book

  • Fans of space opera
  • Fans of the experience of playing games

Who might not like this book

  • No idea.  I suppose such people much exist but I didn’t notice anything offensive here.

Dinner With the Nibblerati

Sunday, February 15th, 2009

Again this year, Vy and I enjoyed the absolutely dreamlike Valentine’s Day menu at Nibblers Eatery.  Those of you who follow me on twitter probably saw an abbreviated and order jumbled rendition of the courses because the twitter service was having some sort of a meltdown.  Here in fuller form, the delicious dishes delivered and dined upon.

  • The amuse was a whisky smoked salmon mousse next to bergamot preserve on baguette toast.  It tasted exactly like you’d expect those two things to taste together, assuming you’ve ever drank Earl Grey tea or eaten lox.
  • For the first course, we chose lobster purses on pea sprouts.  This was a course where Vy knew exactly what she wanted and so we didn’t really discuss the other options available.  I liked every option here and would have been fine with any of them.  There was a sparkling wine tasting paired with this and it really helped cut the doughiness of the pastry satchel.
  • With the second course, we had no strong feelings other than wanting to avoid some ingredients which give us trouble, so we went with the waitress’s suggestion and had the frittata with duck & fig sausage and red potatoes.  As was evident once it arrived, it had a delicious mustard sauce over it.  Well, delicious for me, anyway.  Vy actually didn’t hate the mustard taste which is a tribute to the culinary skills at this restaurant.  It was paired with a red wine.
  • Then, an intermezzo of champagne sorbet.  I’m not a sorbet fan.  This was pretty good for something I don’t much like, certainly better than any of the several fruit sorbets I’ve tried from all sorts of places.
  • Do you know what barramundi is?  Me neither!  But the third course was some of this new-to-me fish, lacquered with mirin and served on a bed of couscous.  This was the winner of the dinner for us both.  I liked the strong tang of curry and mirin and the solidity of the fish.  It had a satisfying texture and engaged the tongue.  Back to a white wine taste paired with this one.
  • Then, because I love to exercise options, I got the cheese plate.  On it were an Andante Pianoforte, a Torta la Serena Serra de Estrela, and a Rogue Creamery Rogue River Blue.  The blue was paired with apple slices and ginger biscuits, the Serra with honey and the Andante with a preserve.  Vy tasted each of them and pronounced the Pianoforte the one she disliked least while I ravaged all three of them and in the end would say what I did as I began, that the blue cheese is my go-to cheese.  Especially the Rogue Creamery, which we’ve had before at Nibbler’s.
  • The meal finished out with a poundcake bite with custard on it and it really put the closure on the meal that you would expect.

As ever, one of the best meals we can remember having since, well, the last time we went to Nibbler’s.  The restaurant was reassuringly crowded on this occasion and so we have hopes they’ll be in business for a good long while yet to come.

Rejected Names for Ubuntu 8.10

Sunday, November 9th, 2008

So I upgraded the two laptops I use to Ubuntu 8.10 which has the friendly name of Intrepid Ibex.  Bold sounding, adventurous, able to scale and bound around on mountains.  One the laptop where I have a variant configuration (using ion3 instead of GNOME, for example) it hasn’t been a big difference.  Everything works at least as well as it did before, and it even seems more robust under some previously challenging load conditions.

The other laptop, the one with a totally default configuration, has been a big pain.  Wireless, never very reliable on it, has completely become unusable and I spent hours yesterday trying to uncover why.  The keyboard became bizarre and the perfectly functional set up under 8.04 required lots of Keyboard Layout fiddling to find something, anything, which would let me use anything more arcane than letters, shifted letters, and the control and enter keys in 8.10.  All of which has me thinking of things which might have been better names for 8.10.

  • Irritating Insect
  • Inconsistent Parakeet
  • Incontinent Iguana
  • Inauspicious Inchworm

Yeah, this is just noise.  I’ll keep using Ubuntu, I’m just annoyed at the number of regressions my laptop suffered by upgrading which I’ll have to spend time fixing because they’re core functionalities I actually use like, oh, having a network connection.  Or, you know, typing.

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!

Visit our friends!

A few highly recommended friends...